Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı Yayınları - page 93

91
Youth’s Social Participation as a Changing Participation Mechanism
JOURNAL OF YOUTH RESEARCHES
According to the model, the main components of youth social participation are as follows;
family and close social environment, educational institutions, social groups and govern-
ment policies and NGOs. In the cyclical process, young people should be encouraged for
social participation and contribution under the supervision of their mentors.
Family and close social environment is responsible for creating societal awareness, en-
couraging for social participation and increasing interaction. Educational institutions are
responsible for teaching the basics of social participation besides delivering the respon-
si- bility of creating societal awareness. Social groups are responsible for carrying the re-
spon- sibilities of family and close social environment and educational institutions a step
further. Then they will serve as a vehicle for encouraging youth for social participation and
for providing diversity and finally state policies and NGO’s by adopting all previous re-
spon- sibilities spread social participation to whole country with a systematical approach.
Consequently the efforts for creating social change increase youth’s interaction with so-
cial and civil activities and participation to them. According to the model, governments
should fulfill their responsibilities with long-term plans, NGO’s in charge with the private
and public sector partnerships, social groups should contribute by adoring young people
and encourage them to be active in different areas and delete most importantly education
institutions, family and close environment should support by adoring young people and
help them to make right decisions.
Kaynakça/References
• Ashman, A. F. Ve Suttie, J. N. (1996). The Social And Community Involvement Of Older Australians With
Intellectual Disabilities. Journal Of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(2), 120-129.
• Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I. Ve Seeman, T. E. (2000). From Social Integration To Health: Durk-
heim In The New Millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843-857.
• Beckley, M. N. (2006). Community Participation Following Cerebrovascular Accident: Impact Of The
Buffering Model Of Social Support. American Journal Of Occupational Therapy, 60(2), 129-135.
• Benson, P. L. (1997). All Kids Are Our Kids: What Communities Must Do To Raise Caring And Respon-
sible Children And Adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Camino, L. (2001). Evaluation As A Tool In Community Building: Perspectives On The Role Of Youth.
Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Evaluation Association, St. Louis, MO.
• Checkoway, B. (1995). Six Strategies Of Community Change. Community Development Journal, 30,
2−20.
• Checkoway, B. N. Ve Gutierrez, L. M. (2006). Youth Participation And Community Change: An Introduc-
tion. Journal Of Community Practice, 14(1-2), 1-9.
• Checkoway, B. (2011). What Is Youth Participation?. Children And Youth Services Review, 33(2), 340-
345.
• Choi Yuen Wan, Philemon (2003). “Social Participation” Youth.
/
Template/Common/Images/Research/2003_Youth/Socialdrchoi.Pdf Erişim Tarihi: 14.07.2017.
1...,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92 94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,...208
Powered by FlippingBook