149
        
        
          Education for Citizenship and Youth in France
        
        
          JOURNAL OF YOUTH RESEARCHES
        
        
          “school citizenship” today is based on a skeptical opposition to some. The question
        
        
          arises from: How is it possible to reconcile the use of citizenship, which is seen as
        
        
          adult status, with the status of being a student in school age? In other words, it cannot
        
        
          be argued that a non-adult is in the capacity to practice the teachings of the given
        
        
          civic education (Arendt, 1989).
        
        
          
            Conclusion
          
        
        
          In a nutshell, since the historical period, the national education understanding that
        
        
          emerged in parallel with the development process of the nation-state has shown an
        
        
          improvement towards creating individualism restricted by collective interests, abstra-
        
        
          cted from the phenomenon of religion. In this context, traditional attitudes and behavi-
        
        
          ors, although constituting the core of the education system, have been the foreground
        
        
          of active citizenship education aimed at raising self-repetition and increasingly auto-
        
        
          nomous and free individuals in the face of current developments. However, this does
        
        
          not mean that individuals who have a conflicting attitude towards common interests
        
        
          are raised. On the contrary, it has been the basic aim of the education system to
        
        
          educate young people who, by their own consciousness will, to advance the common
        
        
          interests of society and the state, embrace democratic and libertarian values for com-
        
        
          munity’s unity and to internalize the concept of “common benefit”. In this educational
        
        
          sense, individualism is complementary and not opposed to collectivist idea.
        
        
          On the individual-state axis, the relationship between autonomy and collectivity, the
        
        
          education of citizenship in France has been predominantly directed at the teaching of
        
        
          national affiliation, especially at the elementary level, even though the content of the
        
        
          educational program emerges from the national borders and gradually becomes more
        
        
          universal in the European axis (Percheron, 1984). In particular, the voluntary commit-
        
        
          ment to France spiritually around republican values (equality, freedom) seems to have
        
        
          settled in students on the basis of the concept of “national pride”. Priority must be
        
        
          given to school education, which assumes the most important role in educating future
        
        
          citizens, in order to be functional, it must be build a collective feeling linked both to
        
        
          the individual will and the national interest by adapting to developments in the face
        
        
          of globalization. The most important thing that France can achieve in this sense is
        
        
          that it can create Republican individualism, which excludes the church in the national
        
        
          education system, and exclusively attaches importance to the state. Only in this way,
        
        
          individuals from different cultural backgrounds can unite around a common ideal,
        
        
          providing the areas of development and freedom provided by individualism. This has