 
          145
        
        
          JOURNAL OF YOUTH RESEARCHES
        
        
          Education for Citizenship and Youth in France
        
        
          consciousness. From this point of view, citizenship can be seen as the mechanism that
        
        
          combines the individual and the collective in the most rational way.
        
        
          In the context of individualism and citizenship, republican individualism can be seen
        
        
          as a solution invented by secular moralists to solve the tension of citizenship between
        
        
          the interests of individuals and the political society defended by citizenship and ethics
        
        
          school book. (Déloye, 1994: 33).
        
        
          Emile Durkheim has an important place in the concept of morality, education and citi-
        
        
          zenship in the context of state-individual relations. Durkheim invites educators to teach
        
        
          social and adaptive individualism based on the interaction of the person and the group,
        
        
          not the individualism that guarantees human rights based on the individual. Durkheim
        
        
          (1925), a moral education writer, supported that public schools are not satisfied with an
        
        
          ethic based on one’s nature, but a moral education based on the historical and social
        
        
          nature of morality is necessary.
        
        
          Education is the founding element of the French citizenship, and school is the instru-
        
        
          ment. When the Third Republic (1870-1940) established a free and compulsory primary
        
        
          school, under the authority of the State, this mission of training the citizen was the
        
        
          central objective.  The school territory used in symbolic sense is defined by a form of
        
        
          distance with regard to the lifestyle of its surrounding territory (Bier et al., 2010: 17-19).
        
        
          When we say school territory, we refer to two things: the space materially occupied by
        
        
          the school, which is related to its geographical, urban, periurban or rural, economic
        
        
          and social environment; and its functional space, a territory conceptualized by its edu-
        
        
          cational function (Garnier, 2014). Therefore, the school is defined as a functional space
        
        
          both in terms of environmental (in this respect Pierre Bourdieu’s (1966) contribution to
        
        
          sociology of education which established that the connections between space and
        
        
          education are important), as well as the tasks it performs in relation to the power of
        
        
          individual-state relations. This functionality is becoming even more important in the
        
        
          context of state who supports active citizenship projects.
        
        
          
            Contents of the Education for Citizenship
          
        
        
          In the foundation of the citizenship education, four features seem remarkable. First of
        
        
          all, the civic education avoids consideration of politics. Then, we are far from learning
        
        
          the critical esprit and the debate; we are in a normative model. Moreover, it is above
        
        
          teaching, an intellectual and sensitive learning (one mobilizes the emotion, the myths).
        
        
          Finally, it concerns only the pupils of the popular classes (Bier, 2014: 12). It is during
        
        
          the Liberation that “civic education” was introduced in the whole education system;