Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı Yayınları - page 39

37
JOURNAL OF YOUTH RESEARCHES
The Internet and Political Participation: An Evaluation on Turkish Youth
• Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A
resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476-498.
• Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma presidential address, Ameri-
can Political Science Association, 1996. American political science review, 91(1), 1-14.
• Marien, S., Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2010). Unconventional participation and the problem of inequa-
lity: a comparative analysis. Nomos Verlag.
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Geo-
rgetown University Press.
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The Internet. Society and
Participation.
• Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. Vintage.
• Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of So-
ciety, 3, 14-19.
• Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and mass media: A preliminary report. IT & Society, 1(2), 134-141.
• Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide.
Cambridge University Press.
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
• Noveck, B. S. (2000). Paradoxical partners: Electronic communication and electronic democracy. De-
mocratization, 7(1), 18-35.
• Oser, J., Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A
latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1),
91-101.
• Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European
journal of communication, 20(4), 435-459.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223-
234). Palgrave Macmillan US.
• Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation: An analysis of sur-
vey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411-427.
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the
Internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 487-509.
• Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a
form of political participation. International political science review, 26(3), 245-269.
• Stanley, J. W., & Weare, C. (2004). The effects of Internet use on political participation: Evidence from an
agency online discussion forum. Administration & Society, 36(5), 503-527.
• Strandberg, K. (2006). Parties, candidates and citizens on-line: studies of politics on the Internet.
• Şener, G., Emre, P. Ö., & Akyıldız, F. (2015). Türkiye’de Sosyal Medyanın Siyasi Katılıma Etkileri. Folklor/
Edebiyat Dergisi, Yeni Medya Çalışmaları Özel Sayısı, 21(83), 3.
• Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation?. Po-
litical research quarterly, 56(2), 175-185.
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American
politics. Harvard University Press.
• V. Shah, Nojin Kwak, R. Lance Holbert, D. (2001). “ Connecting” and” disconnecting” with civic life:
Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.
• Ward, S., & Vedel, T. (2006). Introduction: The potential of the Internet revisited. Parliamentary Affa-
irs, 59(2), 210-225.
1...,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,...208
Powered by FlippingBook